The Book of Daniel: Part I
Argues that the Book of Daniel was composed as a covert theological-political tract addressed to the Hasidim resisting Antiochus IV's Hellenizing persecution, its true setting disguised under Babylonian and Persian time-lines, and draws out point-by-point parallels between Daniel's Babylonian tales and the Seleucid-era struggles over Hebrew identity, kosher law, idolatry, and the promise that empires persecuting Israel inevitably fall.
Moskowitz argues that the Book of Daniel was composed as a covert theological-political tract for the Hasidim resisting Antiochus IV’s persecution, its real Seleucid-era setting deliberately disguised beneath a Babylonian and Persian timeline. He draws detailed parallels between Daniel’s court tales — maintaining Hebrew identity, dietary law, and resistance to idolatry under threat of death — and the pressures facing Hellenistic-era Jews, reading the book’s central message as an assurance that persecuting empires inevitably fall while Israel endures.
Nathan Moskowitz, M.D., Ph.D., is a neurosurgeon in private practice and Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins University.
Cite this article
Nathan C. Moskowitz. "The Book of Daniel: Part I." Jewish Bible Quarterly 38, no. 2 (April – June 2010): 97–105.
Nathan C. Moskowitz. "The Book of Daniel: Part I." Jewish Bible Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, 2010, pp. 97–105.