Rebekah's Hoax
Reads Rebekah's deception of the blind Isaac as the decisive instance of women acting as initiators in Genesis, examining the dependent marriage and lopsided parental attachments that set it up, questioning why she never simply told her husband about the oracle, and arguing that the painful consequences visited on both mother and son show the narrative refusing to endorse the idea that ends justify means.
Matalon situates Rebekah among the women whose initiative drives Genesis and Exodus. He first maps the household: a husband whose love reads as dependence and consolation after his mother’s death, a father whose affection for Esau is bound up with the food his son supplies, and a mother whose preference for Jacob the text never explains. Against that background he weighs why Rebekah chose trickery over conversation, surveying midrashic and medieval answers, including Kimhi’s uncomfortable suggestion of jealousy. The consequences, from permanent separation to Laban’s substitution of Leah and the brothers’ bloodied garment, persuade Matalon that Scripture depicts the patriarchs as fully human rather than exemplary.
Guy Matalon is Assistant Professor of Judaic Studies in the Department of Philosophy and Religion at the University of Nebraska at Omaha.
Cite this article
Guy Matalon. "Rebekah's Hoax." Jewish Bible Quarterly 36, no. 4 (October – December 2008): 243–251.
Guy Matalon. "Rebekah's Hoax." Jewish Bible Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, 2008, pp. 243–251.